Saturday, June 17, 2006

Testing, 1 2 3...



Q: What two things do H. H. Goddard, Francis Galton, Lewis Terman and Carl Brighan (father of the SAT) have in common?
A: 1) they were all members of the eugenics movement (made famous by Adolph Hitler)...and….
2) They all were all pioneers of the standardized testing industry that our society is so very fond of today!

Yes, the prominent developers of the IQ and other standardized tests advocated the selective breeding of “high grade” persons, believed that intelligence was genetically predetermined, and that it, along with characteristics like mental illness and criminality, are correlated with race. Hmmmm……

Meanwhile, standardized testing has become a multi-billion dollar a year industry. The state of Florida, for example, spends at least 27 million a year contracting its standardized test the FCAT, to a private company, McGraw-Hill to make and grade. Who knows how much all the test prep materials cost in addition to that “meager” fee (the test prep package you see to the left cost $300.). The SAT costs 41 dollars a person to take, not counting the study aids, test score reports, and PSATs etc. AP tests are pricy as well, and each school gets additional funds for every student they have enrolled in an AP class. Then there are the GREs, SAT and GRE subject tests, the MCAT and the LSAT.

I don’t know about anyone else, but I can personally speak for the amount of money I dumped into the LSAT. First there was the 200 bucks to join the LSDAS (Law School Data Assembly Service)…this was not optional. Plus, it cost about $114 each time I took it. Then, there was the $12 score report sent to each school to which I applied. Plus study aids. This is not to mention the many, many very expensive test prep courses that are out there, the cheapest ones around $500.

My point? This is all a huge, money-making racket, with a sinister past and an inequitable result. I for one am a strong believer that a person’s ability cannot be determined by their performance on a standardized test. There is a lot to be said for hard-work and determination. What’s more, as a former educator, I am convinced that learning cannot be adequately assessed by some generic, timed, bubble-sheet test that contains tricky questions and unfamiliar language. Children today are over-tested and have lost their appreciation for learning. Education has become another chore, another forced performance in which they are judged, ranked and labeled beginning at very young ages. I am convinced that nothing psychologically harms young people more than labels.

Standardized testing will not solve educational problems, nor is it, in my humble opinion, an adequate measure of future academic performance, despite what the industry-funded studies might say. How many teary-eyed straight-A students, did I console during my time as a teacher who came to me crying about their mediocre SAT scores? Would those same students go on to make fine grades in college? Yes. How sad am I that after their SAT scores came in, their perception of their own intelligence was forever changed. They were now officially average. Mediocre. The test had spoken. This number would now follow them, and define them and their potential forever. Certain opportunities would not be available to them because of this number. Doors would close, either actually or in the child’s mind. How much of standardized testings’ “predictive ability” is merely just a self-fulfilling prophecy?

Today, many teachers have no choice but to teach tests instead of passing on a love for learning. Instead of teaching young people HOW to learn and HOW to truly THINK, analyze, and process ideas for themselves, we teach them to memorize the facts the system says are important so they can pass a test, boost school scores and then forget the information a few weeks later. We stifle creativity and independent thought because it doesn’t fit into our state-mandated curriculum guide. We reject the idea that not every kind of “smart” can be measured in an hour and a half with a number two pencil. We are failing our children.

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

I completely agree with you, dear cousin, and fully believe that I have no capacity of independent thought due to excessive (and egregious) testing. Do you suppose that home-schooling (and missing out on all of the PACT, etc) has given you the ability to think creatively,intelligently, and independently, handing you an edge over those of us who suffered the indignities of standardized testing?

Madam Mim said...

actually, we had to do standardized testing every year and...I took the CAT and the Iowa. The good thing was that mom didnt care as long as we scored in the average category.... so we never studied for the test or anything...and.... I KNOW that you have capacity for independent thought and so do a lot of kids who go through standardized testing and that whole rigamarole... but, i think more time and effort could be spent on other things than taking tests...

Anonymous said...

I totally agree Mims that a genetically predetermined intelligence that can be singularly quantified is preposterous. Have you read Howard Gardners results/studies/books from his research at Project Zero at Harvard regarding Multiple Intelligences? You definitely should if not. "Frames of Mind" is the standard and though I haven't read it I understand "Changing Minds" is a recent continuation/update of that doctrine. Of course mainstream public education hasn't adopted such a viewpoint on intelligence (thanks in large part to Bushs No Child Left Behind and the inevitable gearing towards passing that test to retain a passing school score and the corresponding federal funds that results) b/c it is highly progressive and you can always count on people in large groups to lean towards the conservative...especially educators :-P... so its sad.
And YES! futbol is the best! I can't play or watch it enough! (Though not b/c of the skinny shirtless men that attracts you lol)
USA! ALL THE WAY!
Nathan R

tara said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
tara said...

Translation: "My roommate's job is a load of sh*t."

I kid, I kid. I totally agree with you, and I'm just selling my soul for two years of financial security working on FCAT training materials so I can stay in school. By the way, if you need any more fuel for your fire about the FCAT, I'm sure I could supply you with some lovely morsels from work. Just read through the FCAT homepage - http://www.firn.edu/doe/sas/fcat.htm
You might especially be interested in how often demographics come into how results are displayed. And there's a sample test.

And I didn't even know you wrote this when I wrote my blog today. Mind if I reference you and repost?

(By the way, just an FYI, the state doesn't sell or authorize any test prep packages for the FCAT - they have a range of FREE resources available in hard copy and online. But, just like the GRE, the SAT, and the LSAT, private companies make millions in trying to guarantee success on the FCAT. It's like the diet industry, but much more shady. You've got to check out the youtube stuff.)

Kristina said...

What is the answer? Most educated people agree that standardized testing is not a good system of measuring success of teaching the whole child. What is? The only thing that frustrates me more about the educational system than standardized testing and the pay is the toleration of inefficient, even harmful teachers. How do we keep teachers accountable for how and what they teach?

Madam Mim said...

we pay good teachers what they desoerve and we fucking fire the bad ones. The public educational system tolerates bad teachers for 2 reasons - 1) they are afraid of lawsauits and 2) most importantly, there is a teacher shortage. No one wants to work t heir ass off for 28,000 a year. If you pay them, they will come....

Kristina said...

Yes! Yes! Pay good teachers more. I agree absolutely. Pay them and they will come. While they're at it decreasing class size wouldn't hurt either.

I think inside politics also has a lot to do with why many schools currently keep poorly performing teachers. Some principals don't have enough balls to ****ing fire the bad ones.